How to Evaluate Test
In particular, the chapter reviews specific aspects associated with assessments which include its purpose and corresponding elements that make up these oral and written examinations.
Principles of test content and assessment procedures constitute better dynamics in administering proper mechanics in associating functions and principles relating to a specific topic.
Similarly, the ideas surrounding scores, norms, and reliability were also discussed in detail to provide readers with effective ways on how these parameters impact the creation of assessments. At the same time, it also allows the educator to become fully involved with formal mechanisms that targets essential aspects related to the course.
Also, reliability and validity is discussed in the chapter to consider what important principles can shape greater elements in advocating fair and accountable practice. These elements are indeed necessary to achieve these crucial points and highlight effectiveness of pinning down the assessments based on the curriculum provided.
The last part seeks to convey the relevance of using summative evaluations. Here, it takes advantage of using this principle to further and sum up all these aspects together. By creating this, the educator can capitalize on providing both a simple and comprehensive review of the qualitative and quantitative variables that are equally important in measuring competency and effectiveness of instruction.
Chapter 10 Assessment of Academic Achievement with Multiple-Skill Devices
This specific chapter focuses in determining the variables involved in a multiple skills assessment. It considers the principles that shape assessments and tries to categorize each one according to the specific functions it tries to show. Similarly, these examinations also induce better capacity to develop appropriate principles in determining what elements induce academic achievement.
Given these, a particular section includes the significance of using assessment within the context of measuring academic achievement. The principle behind this revolves around justifying whether or not the strategies used for instruction are effective and efficient in achieving mandated goals and objectives.
In particular, the chapter outlines different types of assessments that can be used by educators in testing achievement of their students. The author then provides a description of each and justifies its significance and usage. These types include (1) Stanford Achievement Test Series, (2) Terra Nova, (3) Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised-Normative Update, (4) Wide Range Achievement Test, (5) Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, and (6) Diagnostic Achievement Battery (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Given these strategies, each aspect of achievement testing coincides with specific standards and protocols that seek to measure the abilities of students in key areas (e.g. reading, writing, and speaking).
The last section of the article focuses on what benefits can educators get if they have a firm background of these strategies. It not only furthers their capacity to create effective assessment to students, it also brings about a responsible and accountable teaching practice that is congruent with existing educational standards.
Chapter 11 Using Diagnostic Reading Measures
The focus of this chapter surrounds the available reading assessments that educators can use to measure the competency of students. It takes into account the basis for these tests and justifies important principles shaping these assessments altogether.
Seeing this, the first section points out the main reasons and arguments for measuring reading skills and comprehension. It takes into account the strategies of how reading is taught. The existence of these measurements seek to promote better ways to understand the effectiveness of these strategies as it relates with the increasing needs of students.
Given that particular skills are necessary to achieve reading comprehension, the chapter also indicates different variables that educators can use to enhance these processes. It points out criteria for evaluation and considers the purpose of using these diagnostics in order to determine appropriateness. Such process then allows the educator to pinpoint effective patterns that can induce appropriate levels of competency and expectations among their respective students. In particular it seeks to address key areas such as (1) word recognition, (2) word attack, (3) reading comprehension and (4) other reading behaviors.
At the same time, the chapter also seeks to illustrate the available standards in measuring reading competency. These assessments are present to provide readers the ability to synthesize and capitalize the value and significance of classroom instruction. Here, emphasis is given towards (1) Group Reading Assessments and Diagnostics Evaluation (GRADE), (2) Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) and (3) The Test of Phonological Awareness Second Edition Plus (TOPA 2) (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Chapter 12 Using Diagnostic Mathematics Measure
Measuring competency in Mathematics is the key feature of this chapter. Here, the authors point out the significance of using assessing competency in this field because of it represents a core discipline within education and teaching. Due to this, the overall chapter highlights these aspects accordingly and justifies different strategies in doing so.
The first section deals with establishing the purpose of gauging mathematical competency. It tries to argue on how this method can supplement educators in merging instruction towards student capacity to appreciate and value the mathematic process both as a discipline and an effective component in different situations.
Likewise, the chapter also highlights the value and significance of using these tests as an effective gauge in understanding the purpose and value of behaviors. Seeing this, it argues on studying these values in order to justify appropriate instruction mechanisms necessary in the classroom.
Given its significance, the chapter then contends on the appropriate measures that can facilitate these data accordingly. Here, it derives from different testing standards that try to measure specific variables and behaviors by students. Such ability then creates better capacity to determine achievement capabilities of students and at the same time decipher strengths and weaknesses associated with mathematical instruction.
These standards that the chapter provides information about includes (1) Group Mathematics Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (G-MADE) and (2) Key Math-3 Diagnostic Assessment (KeyMath-3 DA) (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Chapter 13 Using Measures of Oral and Written Language
This chapter considers the value and application of using oral and written language assessments. It provides specific reasons for applying and using strategies in both written and oral language by elaborating on specific strategies induce learning and appreciation.
One section deals with understanding the purpose of observing language behavior and how language can be used towards application and interpretation. In particular, it considers elements related to specific oral and written language tests.
Specific features conveyed in this aspect of usage spontaneous language, imitation, elicited language, and the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. This then encourages better application of analysis by pointing out specific factors that influence its facilitation. Likewise, particular attention is also provided on these elements specific advantages and disadvantages towards assessment and classroom interaction.
To supplement this endeavor, particular testing standards are provided to induce better ways to gauge the abilities of students. This then enables effective correlation between instruction and the aspect of highlighting patterns that induce changes. By comparing these standards altogether, educators can create better decisions on what is the most applicable standard to correlate with oral and written language.
It involves (1) Test of Written Language-Fourth Edition (TOWL-4), (2) Test of Language Development Primary Fourth Edition, (3) Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
The chapter highlights these particular issues and detailing the avenues that can stimulate and provide effective patterns for effectively measuring competency.
Chapter 14 Using Measures for Intelligence
This chapter offers readers the perspective in using measures for intelligence. It corresponds to the usage and application of different patterns that influence aptitude. In particular, it considers several behaviors and allows people to correlate these by indicating each one within the parameters of specific standards mandated by the State.
It first starts by elaborating important elements that induce such behavior. These essentials are often stimulated by factors such as vocabulary, pattern completion, induction, generalization, etc.
Similarly, the factors influencing test behaviors are also elaborated by the paper and try to address specific issues that influence these areas accordingly. By seeking to elaborate on these issues, sufficient interpretations can be obtained and influence better patterns of identifying intelligence.
The last part of the chapter tries to indicate the different types of inteligence tests that can be administered and what these standards entail. In essence, it is more of a comparison that tries to deduce which ones are most appropriate given a specific factors and behaviors. These include (1) Nonverbal intelligence tests, (2) individual tests, and (3) group tests.
In the end, the chapter identifies different established and formalized testing structures that coincide with the need to identify intelligence among students. Descriptions and parameters for measurement are determined within standards such as (1) Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children IV, (2) Woodrock-Johnson-III Normative Update Test of Normative Abilities, (3) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test- Fourth Edition (PPTV-4) (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Chapter 15 Measures of Perceptual and Motor Skills
The main objective of this chapter is to allow educators to determine the significance and relevance of using perceptual-motor skills. It tries to argue its relevance within the classroom and how educators can use these as effective instruments to induce achievement and competency in disciplines.
To correspond to this endeavor, the main focus of the chapter is identifying the different patterns that shape this idea altogether. This section argues on the available measuring parameters that influence and provide justification for its usage within the classroom. In particular, it tries to provide specific identification of motor skills and how they can be measured by established testing standards.
Given these, the chapter takes into consideration identifying these testing schemes which include (1) Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test, Second Edition, (2) Development Test of visual motor integration (Beery VMI) (3) Koopitz-2 Scoring System for the BVMGT-2, and (4) The Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test Family (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
All these testing standards coincide with the capacity to induce better ways to measure and identify patterns that shape competency altogether and generate effective patterns of determining what students need and how instruction can be adjusted to suit these endeavors.
Chapter 16 Using Measures of Social and Emotional Behavior
This particular chapter identifies how behavior (social and emotional) can influence the capacity of students to perform in the classroom. It considers generating new dynamics that can induce and justify assessment so as to provide appropriate intervention and support from educators.
The first section tries to identify different strategies to identify emotional and social behavior among students. It takes into consideration both internal and external factors that influence the capacity of students to be motivated and feel left out in discussions and patterns of social interaction. Among the processes that the chapter includes involves (1) interview techniques, (2) situational measures, and (3) rating scales (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
After this, the chapter then gives an explanation of the need to assess social and emotional behavior among students. In particular, it takes into consideration the value and perspective of cultivating patterns that shape these ideas and what options are readily available for the educator to use in such times.
Given these, the chapter then provides the justification for using functional and behavioral analysis. It takes into account factors that influence such behaviors and allocates appropriate solutions and recommendations that the educator needs to do in order to facilitate the needs of the students accordingly.
In particular, this section provides steps in creating effective and efficient steps in completing a comprehensive functional behavior assessment. Here, it tries to consider effective dynamics that equally shape involvement and uses specific measures to assess social-emotional behavior. This then brings about the introduction to Behavior Assessment for Children Second Edition (BASC-2) (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Chapter 17 Measures of Adaptive Behavior
This particular chapter tries to define adaptive behavior and its corresponding impact within the classroom as it relates with the ability of students to adjust to these trends and gain achievement in their corresponding subjects.
This takes into account factors that shape these areas accordingly. Here, it tries to address issues in aspects such as (1) performance vs. ability, (2) social and cultural expectations, (3) age and adaption, and (4) physical environment (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009). All these things hold equal importance in identifying and portraying effective patterns that shape and continue to sustain student and educator motivation.
Similarly, the chapter also indicates the existence of maladaption and how it can become a hindrance in achieving the objectives of adapting to the classroom environment. Specifically, it tries to look into patterns that coincide with reinforcing the limited abilities of students to understand the classroom environment. Given these, the chapter points out the context of its application as well as the frequency and amplitude of the process.
Given these, the chapter indicates the different patterns in assessing adaptive behavior. It takes into consideration numerous principles that shape these features and tries to supplement each one with a dynamic approach that takes into consideration its inclusion within the ability of educators to devise effective patterns for change.
In the end, the chapter then explores the question of the need to assess adaptive behavior. It tries to consider its impact within the classroom and the ability of educators to respond to these. This then brings about a greater responsibility for educators to come up with new strategies to increase patterns of involvement and facilitate an environment of learning.
Chapter 18 Measures for Infants, Toddlers and Preschools
This particular chapter focuses on the different measurement and testing standards available for children particularly those who are infants, toddlers, and preschools. These remain to be essential in creating a continued pattern of measurement in the cognitive, social, and emotional abilities of these individuals to adjust to classroom life in the future.
The first section of the book outlines purpose of these measurements and tries to identify the different factors that shape this endeavor altogether. In particular, it uses specific factors determined by particular testing standards in order to allocate and create new ways to understand the abilities of students to respond to the educational environment.
Given these, the chapter then indicates numerous testing standards that are available and the educator can use. The existence of these examinations seeks to identify available patterns and induce new parameters towards cultivating the creation of new lesson schemes and instructional methods. By determining these patterns accordingly, it can help sustain educational goals even at a young age and create educational responsibility in imparting appropriate outcomes for development.
The testing standards that were introduced and specified in this article includes (1) Bayley Scales of Infant Development Third Edition (Bayley-III), and (2) Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning Third Edition (DIAL-3) (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Chapter 19 Using Technology-Enhanced Measures
This chapter specifically argues about the relevance of technology in instruction and how it can be improved with the creation of testing standards that synchronizes these devices or methods towards what the classroom needs.
These patterns accordingly provide effective simulation of key subject areas such as Science and Mathematics by providing educators with complementary options in order to guide students in responding to these changes accordingly. By providing specific options particularly Continuous Technology-Enhanced Assessment Systems, it can facilitate the achievement of its objectives as it relates to classroom management and curriculum development (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
Similarly, the chapter also provides different strategies that create opportunities to recognize the value of technology. Using different subjects as baseline, the chapter points out the relevance of using technology measures as a means to complement assessment and provide better ways to determine competency of students. In particular, it tries to discuss the value of using the Periodic Technology-Enhanced Assessment Systems and its value within the overall goal and objective (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
These assessment systems include areas such as (1) STAR Math, (2) STAR reading, and (3) AIMSweb (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009). These options then properly determine the impact of technology and what areas are still needed to be improved. In addition, other measurements are also indicated by the chapters which are (1) computer scoring systems, (2) handheld observation systems, and (3) classroom response systems (Salvia, Ysseldyke, and Bolt, 2009).
0 comments:
Post a Comment